Skip to main content

The rise of China and what this implies

It cannot be denied that the 21st century has seen the entrance of newer players into the global superleague. Countries which were hitherto semi industrialized or semi peripheral as concerns the international economic system have been transformed into economic powerhouses almost overnight. Countries in the Far East, such as Malaysia, Singapore and South Korea make up this list. Of particular interest, however is the People's Republic of China.

In Imperialism, Lenin observes that weak and underdeveloped economies can become developed and industrialized - to the point of challenging the 'traditional' developed economies - at a very fast pace, as in the case of Germany in the second half of the 19th century.

Throughout the 20th century, China's economy was nowhere near those of the powerful Western countries. The situation is completely different now. China has made strides in industry and agriculture, and its economy is only second to that of the United States. In fact, so developed have the industrial firms been in China that they have been forced to spread their operations into other countries in a bid to maximize profitability. Less industrialized countries, especially those in Africa, have seen more and more Chinese investment in their economies.

But how mutual is this relationship? Is this genuine assistance towards better living standards from the people of China or is this another case of imperialist control of our economies already under the shackles of monopoly financial capitalism? Are the workers of China, whose vanguard should be the Communist Party of China, expressing their solidarity with the workers of the developing countries with the ultimate ambition of abolishing capitalism and creating a classless society?

Being a socialist society means being in transition towards a communist society, where classes have been abolished and the workers are in full control of the means of production. All aspects of Chinese society should, therefore, exhibit characteristics of a people in this transition. Rushing to occupy 'spheres of influence' with the view to develop one's economy by exploiting and further impoverishing those of developing countries is, however, not reflective of a socialist society on the road to communism, and is contradictory to the ideas of Karl Marx. Indeed, many have questioned the rightist turn that the Chinese government made after the death of Mao Zedong, founder of Chinese socialism. A proper definition of the Chinese mode of production would be State Capitalism, not Socialism.

Nonetheless, it must be acknowledged that China has risen, and is competing directly with America and Western Europe in the economic front. Areas that were previously considered under the complete economic control of the United States and their European counterparts are opening up to Chinese interests. Whereas this situation is understandable as the dynamism that is characteristic with the capitalist mode of production, the consequences are often intricate and difficult to understand. What is clear, however, is that whenever a new country emerges to challenge the traditional imperialist countries occupying the core of the global economic system, all manner of retaliatory measures are applied, in a bid to maintain the latter's position as the sole beneficiary of the system. In many cases, this conflict turns violent.

The First World War, many historians maintain, was an inter-imperialist war, driven by the need for the competing empires of Europe to restructure their territories. More importantly, the economic conflicts between Germany and Britain needed to be settled. The Second World War occurred primarily due to the emergence of the United States and Japan as major imperialist powers, and needed to be included in the list of 'exploiter' countries. A war was therefore inevitable, in order to reallocate 'spheres of influence' among the advanced capitalist states, as well as to deal with the growing influence of the Soviet Union.

Inasmuch as various conditions may trigger the outbreak of armed conflict, the primary reason is always the same; economic interests. The rise of China as an economic power, and its increasing influence in world geopolitics, only serves to move the world closer to armed conflict. The capitalists never relent to use force to meet their ends, and as long as capitalism remains our mode of production the world can only expect periodic wars driven by greed and the desire to exploit, with total disregard to the basic principles of human life.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is socialism?

A frequently arising matter in various ideological and political discussions is the economic advocations of the system of socialism, its practicality, and how to achieve it. Oftentimes, one has to foremost explain the scientific basis of socialism as a mode of production, without which it becomes difficult to clarify our agitation for it. Perhaps a basic question would be; what is socialism? A thorough understanding of socialism is critical to understanding the reasons for our advocation for the same. But this is needless to mention. Foremost, contrary to what most people think, socialism is not a ‘ wonderful idea ’ created by some ‘ would be ’ world reformers or humanitarians. Socialism, contrary to the perception of many people, some even within our ranks as the African Socialists, is not an economic system based on charity, helping the poor or promoting welfare programs. It is not an economic model simply geared towards providing social amenities such as housing, healthcare, e...
4 comments
Read more

What is the relevance of the struggle of Pio Gama Pinto to our Revolutionary Struggles today?: Speech at the book launch of 'Pio Gama Pinto; Kenya's Unsung Matyr'

The ever increasing political and economic strife, the ever widening gap between the rich and the poor, the increased militarism of global imperial forces, and the advent of neoliberalism all point to one thing; the class struggle, naturally, keeps getting more and more acute. As the society keeps getting more and more unequal, so does the need for the ruling classes to protect themselves more and more from the people, and, therefore, so does their thirst to maintain the monopoly of violence in a bid to keep the people enslaved. What, therefore, does this mean for us? What are we to do? The need for we as the people to resist this onslaught, as has been done for years and years, cannot be more imperative. For we, as the toiling people, this means nothing but desperate struggle to counter what we can comfortably call desperate resistance from the ruling elite. We have the responsibility to carry through the class struggle to its logical conclusion.   Ushikwapo shikamana, au ...
2 comments
Read more

Analysing xenophobia in South Africa

You know something is wrong with your society when you cannot tolerate people from other societies. But when this intolerance becomes violent, you know something is seriously wrong. The xenophobic attacks in South Africa are as disturbing as they are surprising. Disturbing in that one cannot imagine the violence and atrocities that may be directed towards foreigners in the country, and surprising in that one cannot imagine an African relating to a fellow African with hostility and suspicion. But perhaps it is important to examine the root cause of this xenophobic violence. With this regard emphasis should be laid not on the direct triggers of the violence, but on the general composition of the society of South Africa. South Africa remains one of the most scarred African countries in relation to colonial exploitation. The settling of the Boers, as early as the seventeenth century, was itself a critical problem. Native populations were displaced, and many have never recovered their land...
1 comment
Read more