Skip to main content

Analysing xenophobia in South Africa

You know something is wrong with your society when you cannot tolerate people from other societies. But when this intolerance becomes violent, you know something is seriously wrong. The xenophobic attacks in South Africa are as disturbing as they are surprising. Disturbing in that one cannot imagine the violence and atrocities that may be directed towards foreigners in the country, and surprising in that one cannot imagine an African relating to a fellow African with hostility and suspicion.

But perhaps it is important to examine the root cause of this xenophobic violence. With this regard emphasis should be laid not on the direct triggers of the violence, but on the general composition of the society of South Africa. South Africa remains one of the most scarred African countries in relation to colonial exploitation. The settling of the Boers, as early as the seventeenth century, was itself a critical problem. Native populations were displaced, and many have never recovered their land. That notwithstanding, the discovery of gold, diamonds and other precious minerals spelt doom for the majority of native Africans. A huge labour force of mine workers had to be created among the populace, with many more being required to work in the factories. This led to the creation of an urban proletariat, a class of workers working and living under deplorable conditions. The Soweto slums, coupled with an upsurge of criminal violence in urban areas such as Johannesburg, were an inevitable consequence. As though this was not enough, South Africans had to put up with racist violence and oppression during the apartheid era, with many being massacred as their resources kept getting plundered by the repressive ruling class.

The combination of these factors thus created, on one hand, an extremely wealthy stratum of individuals who profit from the exploitation of the toiling masses of South Africa in the mines, factories and other industries, in collaboration with the international monopoly capitalists, and on the other hand an extremely impoverished and angry class of South Africans who live in poor conditions in the presence of superabundance. There exists, consequently, two antagonistic classes in the society of South Africa. The oppressed masses, as in any other society in the world, are subjected to brutality and terror from the state, which acts merely to protect the interests of the ruling classes. Thus, one must be able to recognize the presence of classes in order to analyze the problem in South Africa.

But why xenophobia? Why do these exploited and angry masses turn their frustration to foreigners? The answer to this question lies in the root cause of the problems of ordinary South Africans in the first place. Their displacement by the Boers, their colonization by the British and their general alienation from their own resources has made the ordinary South African skeptical of any foreigner, and tends to view them with deep suspicion.

So what is to be done? Just what is going to make the angry masses, the exploited class of South Africa, cease being xenophobic? Mass sensitization and movements pleading an end to xenophobia are clearly not the solution. The ordinary South African will still not understand why he shouldn't be hateful with regard to foreigners in South Africa.

Hence, the proletarian class in South Africa, comprising the miners, factory workers and all other toiling masses as well as the peasantry, must understand who their real enemies are. It is not the Zimbabwean, the Nigerian or the Malawian coworker in the mine, for example, who is the real cause of his misery, but the owner of the mine who will exploit his labour for peanut wages. The Gambian cleaner at a city hotel, or the Senegalese tailor, is merely a comrade in the struggle for a better system. The ordinary South African must understand that the person to whom all his energies and frustrations must be directed is the bourgeois industrialist working in conjunction with giant monopolies to exploit South Africa, the traditional chiefs inciting workers against each other in order to retain their place and the bourgeois politician anxious to maintain the status quo.

Comments

  1. I agree.We need a revolution towards a classless society.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The task at hand

Decade after decade has seen prominent Pan Africanists come and go, preaching and spreading the same message; Black Consciousness, economic and political emancipation and anti imperialism. Credit to them. It is through their hard work that many of us became aware of the origin and nature of the exploitation that we have had to endure over the centuries. However, words become meaningless when they are not accompanied by action. Future generations will be not so kind to us if we fail to take in the consciousness of our situation, perceive the contradictions in the international economic system, make a tactful and intricate revolutionary plan and, within the shortest time possible, seize political authority and take charge of our destiny. But first, what is to be done? An observation into all previous revolutions, most preferably the Bolshevik revolution, reveals that foremost a theory, or a sort of ideology, has to be developed. For the struggle, as Friedrick Engels observed, would be o...

Permanent Revolution; Tasks of the African Proletariat

The economic,social and political development of the African people in the past few centuries has been, needless to mention, peculiar. In the global stage, the past five hundred years have witnessed the primitive accumulation of wealth in preparation for the dawn of the capitalist era, the agitation therefrom for the abolition of the feudal system of economic production, the onset of the capitalist mode of production and consequently the advancement of modern industry, the advent of monopoly capital and the rise of imperialism and colonialism, and, finally, neocolonialism. The peculiarity of Africa in this case is that it is not at the centre of these developments; it is at the periphery.  Africa is not the initiator of these advancements, it is the recepient. For the primitive accumulation of capital necessary for industrilization in Europe, Africa had to suffer the capture and enslavement of its people in merciless fashion. During the advent of the capitalist mode of production ...

Dialectical Materialism

The philosophical basis of Socialism is dialectical materialism, so called because its view of phenomena, its way of studying and understanding them, its method of apprehending them, is dialectical, whereas its method of interpreting them and internalizing them, is materialistic. Dialectical materialism is created by the fusing together of two major concepts of philosophy; dialectics and materialism. To understand it, therefore, it is critical that one grasps the idea behind these two concepts. Dialectics is a way of looking at things based on analysing their features within them; what characterises their existence and their development. A tree, a book, a human being, a cow and anything else that exists in nature has some features which give it the state of its existence and which determine their development. Looking at them closely and critically, one would realise that there exists some contradictory forces within them, features and characteristics that act opposite of each oth...